This week’s innovation challenge was centered around the topic of human perception. Teams of three students, of various academic backgrounds, were put to the task of identifying observable changes between before and after pictures, as well as the change through pictures in sequence. Imagine this task to be a mashup of “I Spy” and those “before and after” games in magazines. For the before and after portion of the challenge, teams were told that there were between 4 and 10 changes between the two images. Unfortunately, these changes were no where near as noticeable as the massive amounts of weight lost, or hair gained which we have grown accustomed to based on TV before and after advertisements. Instead, the pictures were primarily of office spaces. Objects in the rooms included chairs, desks, books, computers, office supplies, and sometimes people. The before and after images were shown several times to the teams, afterwards, teams had 30 seconds to turn in a piece of paper with the changes they noticed written down. For the rounds that showed the same scene, with slight alterations, over a 6-8 frame sequence, the images were shown twice, and then the teams had 30 seconds to turn in their descriptions of the changes. Finally, there was a bonus round which consisted of a video that instructed us viewers to pay close attention and count the number of footballs that crossed the screen in 10 seconds. The scores were then calculated based on the number of changes accurately observed and a winning team was announced.
This challenge put everyone on an equal playing field, since no one academic major could be advantageous to identifying the changes that occurred between the pictures. Without an academic foundation to approach this challenge, our team decided to talk strategy and split the picture into quadrants in order to make the challenging task more manageable. Right away, the task seemed quite formidable. There was a lot going on in the picture and it could be overwhelming to try and keep note of all the objects and their placement; not to mention that the short term memory skills were tested to the max by this challenge. After the first two before and after picture rounds, we realized that most of the changes were occurring in the middle of the picture. So, we decided to adapt our strategy. We agreed to each spend a little time at the beginning searching for changes in our respective quadrants, to then turn each of our attention to the middle of the picture so that we could observe the highest number of changes. This strategy worked well, as we began to catch a higher percentage of the changes. Our team communication skills were put to the test by the second component of this challenge, the pictures in sequence. The pictures cycled through rather quickly, which meant that people had to say what changes they had just observed, while still looking at the picture so that they may have a hope at recognizing what will change in the next pictures. Our team designated one person to write the observations down to assist with this task. We felt accomplished as a team because we began recognizing the themes of what would change, such as chair placement, which helped us focus our attention. Overall, we did very well, ending up in second place; we had noticed five less observations than the winning team.
Coming into this challenge, I had heard about and experienced how the brain is not able to accurately comprehend and remember everything about your individual surroundings. However, these experiences or learning exposures were not long in duration, meaning I experienced them, but thought little of it. After this challenge, it was all but impossible to not reflect about the implications about how we remember and focus on details, since this challenge reminded us repeatedly of what our minds had missed for almost an hour. After reflecting on the challenge, I think that there are several insights that I took away from participating. First, I felt mentally exhausted after intently focusing on several, very similar, images of office spaces in the hopes of finding small changes. After awhile, the images began to blur together, and I began to question whether or not a chair had moved, or if it was just something I had seen in another scenario. In many fields, the best way to move forward with a product or a system is to examine what you already have. I imagine that people face the same sort of mental fatigue and blurriness that we experienced when they continually analyze these products and systems as their job. As a team, we had to create a strategy to notice these changes; it took more than one individual. We also had to have clear communication for us to be successful at this task. Additionally, we had to adapt to the conditions we were facing in order to recognize the highest number of changes, even if that meant missing a few smaller changes on the side. For example, in the beginning, our team completely missed the fact that in-between two picture frames a large computer in the middle of the image totally disappeared. We were too focused on finding small changes along the outskirts to notice the major change right in front of us. We also learned that sometimes it is important to take a step back and look at the big picture. When we were all focused on individual quadrants of the picture, we were unaware as a team what trends were occurring. It was not until we looked at the picture as a whole that we realized that we needed to adapt our strategy. So, it is important to keep in mind the lesson that it takes a strategy, communication and the time to look at trends to identify how to move forward with projects. These lessons are also pertinent to another realm of the professional world; communication. When talking with colleagues, it is important that you are on the same page about how the discussion is evolving and where the company/project is going from where it is at. If people are too focused on small segments of the larger discussion, they may feel like they are voicing opposing views since they are not both paying attention to the broader context of the bigger picture. No matter the application for the lessons that I learned today, I think that this challenge proved to be both engaging and educational.
Winning Reflection - Ted Stewart-Hester
The challenge this week involved using at least three patents from a list of 24 in a product design that was new and innovative. This product was to solve an issue effecting a majority of society. There were a lot of different patent topics on the list ranging from cars, 3D printing, water filtration straws, to smart watches. As a chemistry student, I was particularly drawn to the “Method and means for the atomizing or distribution of liquid or semiliquid materials” patent. In the end, my team zeroed in on three other patents that we could combine into an actual useful product.
My team consisted of people I had worked with before and this was helpful during the brainstorming process of the group. We were able to collaborate well with each other and listen or pitch ideas without nervousness or embarrassment. We spent a good amount of time coming up with fun and unique ways to combine the patents into our ultimate dream car that even James Bond would be proud of! However, the group realized that the end goal was to solve a societal problem. Once we refocused, we worked backwards.
We started by deciding what problems society faces, then determining which one we wanted to solve. After that it was simple to combine 3 patents into the design of a product to alleviate that problem. The patents we used were the “voice command control and verification system”, the “automatic detection of infectious diseases”, and the “kitchen waste bin” that combined to give the V.A.T.S. product. The Voice Activated Trash Sterilizer would be able to scan biohazardous waste/unsanitary waste for infectious disease and then sterilize them. The device would be hands free so as to minimize the spread of the diseases that can be associated with unsterilized waste. This could be useful for hospitals as well as under-developed countries.
Although in the end my team did not win, we were proud of our product. This challenge also taught us a special lesson; even though something has been invented there may still be a new way to use it!
Winning Reflection - LIz Jolley
This week’s Weekly Innovation Challenge offered interesting insight into the purpose of innovative design. This can be seen very clearly when comparing the design of the winning team to other designs. For me and my team, the opportunity to improve in the future lies in becoming more aware of design steps outside of analysis.
The challenge itself was to “design and build a freestanding lamp” that was to be built only with tape, an LED light, a battery and wire that was provided. The winner was to be selected based on factors from aesthetics and originality to commercial viability.
For our team, we quickly came together to brainstorm how we would make a lamp from tape. We each contributed ideas, deciding to start by building a tripod-style base and make a cone that reflects the light. Altogether, our design was to be like a desk light. A major concern of ours was ensuring that the light had the proper structural integrity. We added colorful tapes to make it more aesthetically appealing.
Though some other teams did traditional style lamps, a few teams stood out with creative designs. Among these designs were a head-lamp shaped like a crown, an airplane lamp, and a lamp in the shape of a fish. The fish-lamp design was selected as the winner. While our team and many others were concerned with the quality of our lamp product, we failed to look at the value for the end user. While there are a huge amount of desk lamps and traditional style lamps on the market, a fish-lamp is new and innovative approach that appeals to the customer.
Ultimately, it is easy to get caught up in what has been done and miss what can be done.
Winning Reflection - Steve Wolfe
There have been previous trivia challenges as part of the Weekly Innovation Challenge. This week’s trivia challenge, however, was a little different in that each team was required to have a laptop. Instead of one computer displaying the trivia question, as is generally the case, each team would work independently from the other teams on trivia questions generated on their computer through the site Google Feud.
There were a number of things about this week’s challenge that were exciting for me. First, I was able to join a team of two people who were regular participants in the Weekly Innovation Challenges, but whom I had never met. It was fun to work with people who had previously been a competitor and now new collaborators! Second, because I was able to join a group that was new to me, I was able to see how others have been approaching these challenges. The newly formed group was instantly able to work together as a team. This may have been motivated by the desire to obtain the common goal of winning! Regardless of what the motivations were, as a group we were able to create a welcoming, working environment. The third exciting part of this week’s challenge for me was the Google Feud website. I had never heard of this site before and am not sure that my professors would be excited to hear I found something else I would rather do than my schoolwork! But whether Google Feud ends up eating a lot of my time or not, I like learning about new things. And that is the real reason I keep coming back to the Weekly Innovation Challenges. This week my team did not win, but every week I walk away having learned something new!
Winning Reflection - LIz Jolley
Today was my first time participating in a weekly innovation challenge and the stakes were high. With $1000 on the line, we were asked to create a pill holder design that would hold four pills a day for seven days and would be appropriate to be used by a middle-aged professional. After completing our design, as a team we had 60 seconds to pitch our idea to a variety of judges who could award us 1-4 points in the form of tickets. At the completion of the challenge, the team that had the most points won the challenge.
Since it was my first time participating in the weekly innovation challenge and I was joining an experienced team that participates regularly, I was nervous going into the challenge. I was concerned about finding the aspects of the challenge in which I could contribute the most. However, I found the challenge to be a great opportunity to learn about working in a group of individuals from diverse interests and academic backgrounds. I completed the challenge with an electrical engineer major and a public health major, while I am a communication science and disorders major. The electrical engineer immediately delved into the design of our iRX portable pill container that could be attached to phones, computers, and tablets. He established how the design could be made compact and aesthetically pleasing. In the meantime, the public health major began developing our pitch and coming up with how our product could relate to the overall health of the individual. This link was made by developing an app that the pill container could sync to the user’s phone that could also be synced to other health apps like Fitbit, to track overall health. As someone who is studying to be a speech pathologist, a very patient-based field, I found myself, looking at the challenge from the potential customer’s perspective and how they would perceive our product. I helped develop a design that would be discrete so that medication, something that can often be personal, is not very public and overt. I also encouraged my team to make a product that attaches to a variety of devices, like phones, computers, and tablets to match the life of professionals that is dynamic and fast-paced.
This challenge also provided me an opportunity to reflect on the mistakes that our team made and how we could have better completed the task at hand. Entering the judging portion of the challenge, I was very confident in our design and its many elements. However, as the rotation of judges stopped by our table, I realized it really came down to the pitch. We had only 60 seconds to express all the excitement that we had about the product and brand we had spent the last 45 minutes creating. If we were to do this challenge again, my team would have spent more time developing a dynamic presentation that would have better showcased our design. With only 60 seconds, each second is an opportunity to acquaint the judge with the design you have worked so hard on. I also learned a lot about the challenge by seeing the winning design of an Altoids box that concealed the pills it contained. By seeing this clever design, I was reminded that sometimes it is best to keep things simple. My team came up with many good ideas, however it is important to edit and refine your final design.
Winning Reflection - Kelsey Arnold
Winning Reflection - Jacob Berry
Today’s challenge was very simple, but yet allowed room for artistic and structural creative. We were instructed to make a tower that stood at least two feet tall and could hold a weight (duct tape roll) and withstand wind. The wind was blown at three different speeds from a carpet-drying fan. If both of these minimum requirements were met, then the judging was based off of aesthetics.
Our goal as a team was to focus on the stability first. We wanted to start with a base that was fairly wind resistant. After we assembled that, we focused next on the strength. The tower had to be sturdy enough to hold a weight, so we made sure that we had enough support. However, in hindsight, our mistake came when we altered the shape of our tower to make a platform to accommodate the weight. Originally, we planned on making the top of the tower small than the base to add stability, but we forgot to add more support at the bottom once the top was altered. The mistake was made because we ran out of time in order to do any tests of our structure.
This challenge taught the importance of time management and quality checks for projects. Efficiency is the key to balancing both. Another lesson learned from the challenge is sticking to all of the guidelines that were created at the beginning of the project. Somewhere along the line, we forgot to re-adjust our base for stability like we originally planned and that inevitably doomed us.
Winning Reflection - Michael Hankins
This week’s challenge was the first trivia challenge for the spring 2015 semester. Although the trivia challenges have proved difficult for me in the past, I was determined to stay positive and have fun while learning something new. This is what the weekly innovation challenges mean to me, namely a weekly opportunity to be innovative and challenge myself in a positive learning environment.
This week was particularly exciting as I had a group made of one member from my group last week, and an entirely new member, and myself. Our group did not come up with a strategy for this challenge seeing as it was to determine the name of Fortune 500 companies from riddles as clues. I dare say this may have been part of our downfall since we did not win the challenge! However, even with no strategy other than go for it, our newly formed team was able to collaborate well with each other and there was instantly no embarrassment about lack of knowledge.
The clues ranged from some that seemed obvious to those that seemed more difficult and required some real thought. Each person has his or her own interests and random facts that they remember. Thus, each person was able to answer some of the riddles that completely stumped other members of the group. It was clear in this week’s challenge to see the importance of personal interests and likes! There was an inherent degree of trust among the members of the group. When one member believed a clue to be a certain company, they were able to convince the group of the truthfulness of the answer with no more persuasion than a simple statement of, “I am pretty sure that is the answer”. It wasn’t until towards the end of the allotted time that the group decided the quality of the answer was less important and just any answer would suffice. I will admit that case only applied to 3 clues!
In the end, my group was not successful in winning the challenge. However, I was successful, as I usually am, in pushing myself to be innovative and challenging myself in the positive learning environment created by the weekly innovation challenge!
Winning Reflection - Liz Jolley
To me, this challenge embodied the purpose of the Weekly Innovation Challenges. I believe they encourage us to sharpen our critical thinking and problem-solving skills in order to benefit humanity. The Disaster Relief Challenge is one that has a more direct influence on a real world problem. We were instructed to design a tent or other kind of mobile housing unit that could be used for families displaced by natural disasters, war, and other types of widespread destruction. This consisted of making a small model to display the design and a 90-second pitch to explain why your idea would work.
Our design idea was similar to other tent ideas that exist now, but with added features that would accommodate for long term living possibly without resources. We had a collapsible tent in which the “legs” could fold in for easier handling. In addition, there was a small gutter with filters inside to collect potable rain water. The poles would be made out of carbon fiber to make them strong, yet lightweight. Also, the covering for the structure had zipper doors and windows, with one side fabricated from a highly reflective mirror material such as tin or aluminum to intensify the sun’s heat and use for cooking or heating.
One key point we figured out relatively early is that the pitch is more important than the model. We didn’t want to invest too much time into the model because it wouldn’t fully convey our idea. Only the pitch could do that. So we decided to make a basic model and work on our pitch. We made a poster to accompany our pitch and display ideas our model could not, such as the material specification.
Our downfall was that our idea was not simple enough. The judges mentioned that one of the properties they liked about the winning design was the simplicity. I feel as though if we decided earlier to spend more time on the pitch then the model, we could have had a better chance. Overall, I learned from this challenge that it is important to prioritize which aspects of the challenge to focus on and that sometimes the simplest answer is the best.
Winning Reflection - Michael Hankins
It became evident that the challenge this week would rely primarily on collaboration and teamwork. When the group leader slapped two boxes of straws on our table, we knew we would be in for quite the challenge. Therefore, a strong team was the key to success and little else would play as important a role. We were given the challenge of building a dome with the requirement of supporting a textbook but we had less than an hour to build it. I wanted to be the one to come up with the great ideas but quickly learned it was more than me working on this build. My teammates were actually the ones with the best ideas and it was my willingness to listen and allow them to take the reigns that led us to eventual success.
We realized there were multiple strategies available to accomplish this goal but our main focus was to build a structure that was sure to perform. We effectively made changes on the fly as we ran into design challenges. This gave us the opportunity to rethink the alternative options and carry forward with the best one. For the purpose of this challenge, we successfully accomplished our goals based on the design specifications we chose
Our team was made up of students with a variety of skillsets. One member would focus on design while another would work on implementing that design. The third team member focused on organization so that we could stay on schedule. The best part of our group dynamics is that we were all familiar with working together so we knew how to communicate electively in order to complete the challenge.
Our final product met our initial expectations. When we started with our design, we had a vision for what we wanted it to look like. We successfully built a product we could all be proud of and we made comments on how our professors would be proud as well. This challenge was exceptionally fun because we were able to apply what we learned in the classroom. Whenever we get a chance to showcase our skills, we gain an opportunity to learn in ways we never could have imagined without this forum.
Winning Reflection - Paul Madsen
Weekly Innovation Challenge Blog
Archive by Date
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012